ICE PLANS TO CONTINUE TARGETED ENFORCEMENT, ENCOURAGING COMPLIANCE IN 2008, MYERS SAYS
12 BNA DAILY LABOR REPORT A-1 January 18, 2008
In 2008, Immigration and Customs Enforcement plans to continue targeted worksite enforcement efforts while reaching out to employers to comply with immigration laws, Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security Julie Myers said at a Jan. 17 American Bar Association Homeland Security Law Institute conference.
Myers, who heads ICE within the Department of Homeland Security, said because ICE is approximately five years old, it is a good time to assess how to move forward with worksite immigration enforcement despite the failure of Congress to enact comprehensive immigration legislation.
“We don't have access to Social Security Administration information about the top 20 employers with the highest rates of non-matching Social Security numbers," she said. "The tax laws prevent us from getting that information from SSA," so ICE doesn't target employers in that way, she said.
Instead, ICE engages in a "risk-based approach" to worksite enforcement and will continue to use this tactic, Myers said. "We target the worst of the worst employers" who hire illegal immigrants as a part of their business model, she said.
Several types of activity are typical of "egregious" employers, Myers said."Money laundering, tax evasion, and schemes where employers use mobile check cashing services to pay workers are all common," she said. In many of these situations the Department of Justice can bring federal charges, she said.
ICE "won't bring criminal charges against employers who accidentally hire an illegal alien," Myers said. Criminal charges are brought against those employers who are "paying workers off the books, ripping up W-2s, and otherwise making an illegal workforce part of the structure of their business," she said.
Myers Calls for 'Culture of Compliance.'
The risk-based approach to targeting employers who hire illegal immigrants is one method of curbing illegal immigration, Myers said. However, criminal cases against employers "won't be enough" and we need a "culture of compliance with immigration laws," she said.
IMAGE, a partnership program between a participating business and ICE promoting the use of best practices, is one method to create a culture of compliance, Myers said. ICE will continue to promote this program in 2008, she said. IMAGE -- ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers -- began in July 2006. IMAGE creates a binding partnership between a participating business and ICE, promoting the use of screening tools, best practices, and continuing education to determine employment eligibility based on immigration status, according to ICE's Web site.
Additionally, in 2008 there will be "a lot more I-9 inspections of employers," Myers said. ICE has the authority to audit the I-9 employment verification form records of any employer. The IMAGE program and the increased inspections foster best practices among companies that have a "long-term business benefit," she said.
Myers said one additional expected development in compliance is that employers who violate immigration law and settle claims with ICE will be required in many settlements to "invest money to make sure they are in compliance with the law going forward."
'No-Match' Rule Expected to Move Forward.
Myers said she expects an additional tool to combating illegal immigration in 2008 -- the use of no-match letters. "I think we will prove victorious in the no-match lawsuit," Myers said. "This will give employers the clarity they need," she said.
The lawsuit was brought by a consortium of labor, civil rights, and business groups challenging a DHS rule under which the Social Security Administration would include in its no-match letters language on employer liability for violating immigration laws (AFL-CIO v. Chertoff, N.D. Cal., No.3:07-cv-4472-CRB, filed 8/29/07).
"We expect legal challenges like the no-match lawsuit," Gus Coldebella, acting general counsel for DHS said. DHS is a new agency "exploring new areas of the law and taking novel actions," he said.
In coming months, DHS will issue clarifications to the no-match rule addressing the court's three main concerns, Coldebella said. On Dec. 14 a federal trial judge agreed to stay proceedings in the lawsuit to give DHS time to develop or amend regulations regarding employer notifications to accompany the no-match letters ( 241 DLR A-1, 12/17/07).